Advertisement

Music Week
Login Form

User login:

Forgotten Password

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Main Page Content:

UK Music seeks to calm waters

10:31 | Wednesday September 16, 2009

UK Music has sought to corral opinion on P2P filesharing following a week of bluster and debate that mirrors the last-minute arguments that sunk copyright term.

In a statement that backs up its commitment to the Government’s recent intervention on the proposed P2P filesharing legislation, which suggested adding suspension of ISP accounts to the potential arsenal it can bring to bear against filesharers, the organisation says “we believe that Government intervention is extremely welcome.”

It adds, “Tackling the issue of unlicensed P2P filesharing is critical…In context of an evolving licensed digital music market, we believe that Government intervention is extremely welcome and that, subject to assessment, Ofcom should be granted appropriate and proportionate powers as directed by the Secretary of State. The purpose of these powers is to encourage users of unlicensed P2P networks towards existing and future digital music services.”

The move, which backs up its position following Business Secretary Lord Mandelson’s intervention on filesharing at the end of last month, follows a frantic few days which in a repeat of the copyright term debate has seen the industry at loggerheads again just weeks before crucial legislation might be passed.

This time the argument is over how to deal with filesharing, with the Featured Artists Coalition whipping up support to condemn Mandelson’s proposed measures to suspend a subscriber’s account (those proposals are still subject to an industry-wide consultation).

UK Music has still to submit its response to the consultation, which ends on September 29.

On Monday Sony and EMI hosted two gatherings for managers and members of FAC to discuss the consultation and Mandelson’s proposals. The meetings were attended by UK Music CEO Feargal Sharkey, FAC CEO Jeremy Silver, MMF CEO Jon Webster, MMF chairman Brian Message, FAC member Ed O’Brien and manager Peter Jenner. One manager in attendance at Sony’s HQ called the meeting “a very good exchange of views”.

However, there was much criticism from managers of Mandelson’s proposals to beef up powers against filesharers. One says, “It is a real vote loser. It is not going to happen because cutting people off can not be right.”

According to insiders, there was also criticism of the role of Universal Music Group International chairman and CEO Lucian Grainge, who has been instrumental in shifting the Government towards stronger penalties against filesharers.

Lily Allen has also waded into the debate, dismissing the thoughts of O’Brien and other FAC members, which she says do not reflect many artists' views on filesharing. She has said, “For new talent filesharing is a disaster.”

Sharkey and others are conscious that the parliamentary timetable for introducing legislation is now very tight and last-minute arguments can not help the industry’s case. Another source says the industry needs to decide if it wants to get something out of the Government or end up with “100% of nothing”.

Sharkey obviously recognises these tensions and says, “Like all of society, like all creative businesses, the UK’s commercial music industry reflects a wide spectrum of viewpoints and opinions. Discussions over recent weeks have drawn us much closer together and helped us to realise with greater certainty our shared vision of the future. We continue to welcome Government’s support and intervention, both of which will be vital to ensure that those who create and invest in music have the opportunity to deliver their full potential and reap the benefits, rewards and promises of an ever-evolving digital marketplace.”

Readers' comments

  • Stefan Levan 16 September, 2009

    I can't believe FAC are trying to protect or tolerate file sharers. FAC should be ashamed of themselves.

  • James Donaghy 17 September, 2009

    In my opinion, we shouldn't affect the internet service of the user but cut off the severs of the infringing p2p sites or stop them gaining access to the uk.

  • Miguel Caetano 17 September, 2009

    UK Music= Bullshitism. What "future digital music services"? Datz Music Lounge? Virgin Media's offer that has been several times delayed by majors because they can't stand up the idea of offering unlimited MP3 downloads? Nobody will give you credibility - and I mean filesharers and music fans alike - if you start with the stick instead of the carrot. Give people reason to trust you. Cutting one's broadband access just for downloading music is an act of bad faith of an industry that relies on a legal monopoly.

Bookmark and Share

Comment on this story

Post your comment

You must fill in all fields marked *

16 September, 2009

 

Main site navigation:
Secondary site navigation:
Main site navigation end
-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-
 
-
Abacus E-media
Abacus e-Media
St. Andrews Court
St. Michaels Road
Portsmouth
PO1 2JH
-

Advertisement